Linguistic Contamination Principles-POTUS Pronouncements-Fair Comment Issues-The Oath Undertaking

FEB 7TH     SINCE TIME BEGAN : salus populi suprema est lex - the right of the people is the supreme law : IN TRUTH WE TRUST     2017 ADE
ESSENTIALS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIAL JUSTICE : MOTHER EARTH TIPPING POINT LAWS UNFOLDED
THE "JUSTIFIED" WAR DOCTRINE & THE "JUST SOCIETY" PRINCIPLE
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
TOPIC : EXECUTIVE POWERS : LIMIT
WHEN THE PRINCIPLE - THE PRESIDENT - ISSUES PUBLIC COMMENTARIES, ARE THERE, HENCE, CREATED CERTAIN DEFINABLE RIGHTS AND DUTIES REGARDING THE TRUSTWORTHINESS OR FACTUALNESS AFFECTING THE NATION STATE ?
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PROTECTING & PRESERVING THE INTEGRITY OF THE US CONTITUTION
WINSTON : "There are a terrible lot of lies going about the world, and the worst of it is that half of them are true.”" : CHURCHILL
THE WIDE COMPARATIVE "IN GOOD FAITH" versus "INFLAMATORY INTENT" HIGHEST OFFICE WORDS
UNDERSTANDING THE ROLES OF ALTERNATIVE FACTS AND FAIR COMMENT IN THE PUBLIC OFFICE
ALTHUSIUS : COMPLY OR RESIGN
Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:—"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
THE LEADERSHIP OATH UNDERTAKINGS OF OTHER NATIONS
EIIR

"By 

Speaking in 1949, the year in which Britain’s first Royal Commission on the Press rejected emphatically the notion that newspapers might be improved by state intervention, Sir Winston Churchill said: “A free press is the unsleeping guardian of every other right that free men prize; it is the most dangerous foe of tyranny… Under dictatorship the press is bound to languish… But where free institutions are indigenous to the soil and men have the habit of liberty, the press will continue to be the Fourth Estate, the vigilant guardian of the rights of the ordinary citizen.”
That has been the settled view in Britain throughout the democratic era, but as they anticipate Lord Justice Leveson’s recommendations for “a new and more effective way of regulating the press”, many Britons may feel tempted into sympathy for a substantially less liberal attitude towards newspaper journalism; the one promoted by the Hacked Off Campaign. It has several attributes of a winning cause. Beyond Hugh Grant’s Hollywood glamour it boasts the support of entirely innocent victims of malicious journalism.
It would take a hard heart to deny that the murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler and her father, mother and sister, Bob, Sally and Gemma, were atrociously treated by the News of the World. Only a fool could defend newspaper treatment of Gerry and Kate McCann, whose daughter Madeleine disappeared in 2007, of Christopher Jefferies, Bristol landlord of the murdered Joanna Yeates, and of the singer Charlotte Church.
Add to these blameless individuals celebrity hacking targets including Elle Macpherson and JK Rowling and the case for what Hacked Off wants begins to appear unassailable. At least, it does until you think about it. Scrutiny exposes its case as offensive to the principle of free speech.

Hacked Off asserts that a “free and accountable media” can be achieved by “independent regulation of the press backed by law”. It is an oxymoron: in what sense can newspapers be independent if they are regulated by statute? Proposals advanced in support of the campaign by the Media Standards Trust confirm that they can’t. The MST proposes self-regulation backed by statute and supervised by an independent auditor with statutory authority."
ALTHUSIUS QUOTATION
The promise of obedience and compliance that follows the election and inauguration is the event in which the members of the realm—or the people through its ephors, and the ephors in its name—promise their trust, obedience, compliance, and whatever else may be necessary for the administration of the realm. This promise, which pertains to things that do not conflict with the law of God and the right of the realm, is made to the magistrate who receives the entrusted administration of the commonwealth, and is about to undertake his office and to rule the commonwealth piously and justly. …

The oath that the magistrate first swears to the subjects, and the subjects then offer to the magistrate, is properly called a homage (homagium) from ? μ ο ?, which means “at the same time” (simul), and ? γ ι ο ν, which means“sacred” (sacrum), so that, as it were, what is common, or a common oath, should be sacred. Those subjects who have upheld this oath are called faithful.

Because of this trust, compliance, service, aid, and counsel that the people promises and furnishes to its supreme magistrate, he is said to have innumerable eyes and ears, large arms, and swift feet, as if the whole people lent him its eyes, ears, strength, and faculties for the use of the commonwealth. Whence the magistrate is called mighty, strong, rich, wise, and aware of many things, and is said to represent the entire people. … 

Such service and aid consist above all in works of occupational skilland in works of allegiance. Works of occupational skill consist in material services extended and performed for the welfare and utility of the realm and magistrate according to the function, trade, and office that each is able to perform. … Works of allegiance consist in obedience and reverence. Obedience is the compliance that is shown to the just commands of the magistrate, and is required even if he should be an impious or wicked man. For the life of the magistrate does not take away his office, and whoever disparages the magistrate scorns God. … However, obedience is not to be extended to impious commands of the magistrate. For obedience to God is more important than obedience to men. … Reverence is that honor, veneration, and adoration that the subject with fear and trembling owes to the magistrate because of the lofty position to which the magistrate is elevated by God, and because of the many and great benefits that God dispenses to us through the hand of the magistrate. Whence the deeds of the whole realm are attributed wisely and happily to the virtue and administration of the prince, and we honor no one in preference to him. …

If the people does not manifest obedience, and fails to fulfill the service and obligations promised in the election and inauguration—in the constituting—of the supreme magistrate, then he is the punisher, even by arms and war, of this perfidy and violation of trust, indeed, of this contumacy, rebellion, and sedition. But if the supreme magistrate does not keep his pledged word, and fails to administer the realm according to his promise, then the realm, or the ephors and the leading men in its name, is the punisher of this violation and broken trust. It is then conceded to the people to change and annul the earlier form of its polity and commonwealth, and to constitute a new one. In both cases, because a proper condition of the agreement and compact is not fulfilled, the contract is dissolved by right itself. In the first case, the prince will no longer treat such rebels and perfidious persons as his subjects, and is no longer required to perform toward them what he has promised. In the other case, likewise, the people, or members of the realm, will not recognize such a perfidious perjurous, and compact-breaking person as their magistrate, but treat him as a private person and a tyrant to whom it is no longer required to extend obedience and other duties it promised. The magistrate loses the right to exact them justly. And it can and ought to remove him from office. Thus Bartolus says that a legitimate magistrate is a living law, and if he is condemned by law he is condemned by his own voice. But a tyrant is anything but a living law. …
THEREIN, THE STANDING QUESTION REMAINS
WHEN THE PRINCIPLE - THE PRESIDENT - ISSUES PUBLIC COMMENTARIES, ARE THERE, HENCE, CREATED CERTAIN DEFINABLE RIGHTS AND DUTIES REGARDING THE TRUSTWORTHINESS OR FACTUALNESS AFFECTING THE NATION STATE ?
POLITICAL COMMENTARIES PUBLISHED BY
Shqwi'qwal   RALPH CHARLES GOODWIN   Yuxwuletun
CV2016 & ADDRESS
Global Free Prior  AMBASSADOR : FPIC TERMS GUIDE  Informed Consent
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ALLODIUM REAL ESTATE REGISTRY