Senate Rules-Judge Gorsuch-Filibuster-"Nuclear Option-Antedate Decision-Making Procedure Quandary

APR 6TH     SINCE TIME BEGAN : salus populi suprema est lex - the right of the people is the supreme law : IN TRUTH WE TRUST     2017 ADE
U.S. SENATE AMENDS RULES MID-STREAM IN ORDER TO CLOSE FILIBUSTER ON GORSUCH HEARING
PRECEDENCE AND EQUITY QUESTION IN ANTEDATE PROCEDURE
aequitas potius qualicumque sermone
Dear
SENATE LEADERS & MEMBERSHIP OF THE WHOLE
Remembering 1988 : H-Con-Res-331
Please, accept this following question as arising in good faith - namely, from a non-sophisticated procedural rules observer, who is interested in jurisprudence and fundamental fairness : i.e., in this matter of the senate convening the Judge Gorsuch hearing regarding his ascendancy to the Supreme Court of the United States; and, where such Senate-of-the-Whole voting would, in the public interest and via constitutional integrity, clearly demonstrate a "good and just faith" manner; therefore :
  1. When Senate members have convened under set Rules of Order regarding Procedure;
  2. How are such Rules changed in an antedate manner for purposes of convenience ?
Summary : It does appear that such antedating of the Senate Rules does set precedence for traditional court and statutory rules to be set aside merely for procedural convenience; rather than to ensure that members and the general public can rely on established Rules of Order when attending either parliamentary institutions or at court; namely,
  • A person who is charged with a traffic violation of illegal parking might find a judge who determines that such breach warrants capital punishment in the conviction; whereas, the charged individual had gone to court with legal counsel, who advised that upon conviction there would be a minor monetary penalty imposed.
Precedence has evolved for sound public interest and judicial purposes as civilized society unfolds. Changing the Senate Rules mid-stream seems to reasonably alarm the citizenry regarding fairness ... And, it causes parents to wonder how to instruct their children about constitutional matters and the doctrines of FREE PRIOR INFORMED CONSENT.

And, one does wonder how this Senate antedate example sits with Judge Gorsuch ? ... And, how he will apply such matters to his Supreme Court of the United States of America - perhaps, he would defer to the original Haudenosaunee emissaries who were invited by the Founding Fathers, when they realized that they were very inexperienced in such matters of constructing lasting fairness and justice into the framing of the 1776 Constitution - the Iroquois Confederacy having achieved more than a thousand years of lasting peaceful co-existence through the Peace, Trust, Friendship-Gus Wen Tah protocol (note : Congress 1988 "appreciation").
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)