Political Oversight Committee: Understanding Libel And Slander In The US of A : Upon Encountering Defamation : Free Speech Limitations

MAR 18TH SINCE TIME BEGAN : salus populi suprema est lex - the right of the people is the supreme law : IN TRUTH WE TRUST 2017 ADE
LEGACIES OF TRUMP FAMILY : LIP READING THE NON-SOPHISTICATED

ALWAYS LOOK ON THE BRIGHT SIDE OF LIFE * STATE DINNERS CAN BE VERY BORING OR EMBARRASSING

SALACIOUS REMARKS : PRIVILEGED OR PATHETIC : PENDING PENALTIES

WHEN IS CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION INADEQUATE UPON DELIVERING INTENDED DEFAMATION ?
REMEMBERING 1885 - 2017 : IMMIGRATION LEGITIMACY : GRANDPA TRUMP : ESCAPED MILITARY SERVICE

MINDING THE PRESIDENT : THE PRESIDENT'S MIND
THE NON-SOPHISTICATED ISSUING LEGAL OPINIONS
*** SPICER ON FLYNN : POLITICAL INDISCRETION NOT BREACH OF LAW ***
WHEN THE PRESIDENT SPEAKS
Impeachment versus Legal Opinions
UNSOPHISTICATED STATEMENTS VERSUS LEGAL ADVICE
*** REFERENCING SCHOLARLY DICTUMS ***
UNDERSTANDING PROFESSOR GOEBEL : FORDHAM UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
RGOEBEL@lAW.FORDHAM.EDU
SPECIFICALLY

Legal Practice Rights of Domestic and Foreign Lawyers in the United States
UNDERSTANDING

"I. THE REGULATION OF LEGAL PRACTICE IN THE UNITED STATES A. State Regulation within the Federal Constitutional System In the United States, rules governing the practice of law are almost entirely state measures, sometimes legislative, more often in the form of court rules.8 Geoffrey Hazard, a leading expert on professional ethics, has accurately described this as "a simple result of our nation's history. ... Regulation of the legal profession [remains] with the States as a matter of tradition and by default [of federal regulation]."9 Although the Congress presumably has the power to regulate the interstate aspects of practice of law on a nation-wide basis under the Interstate Commerce Clause of our Constitution, it has never attempted to do so. Some commentators have recently urged the creation of a national bar under some system of federal minimum rules,' ° but this is presently quite unlikely. The American Bar Association does not even have the subject under active review, and state bar associations would almost certainly vigorously oppose any form of a national bar. State regulation of legal practice is however subject to constitutionally imposed limits. In a leading nineteenth century case, Dent v. West Virginia, the Supreme Court upheld a state law requiring a licence to practise medicine against a challenge under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, because the professional licence system was necessary "for the protection of society"," but the court noted that the licence should be based upon reasonable educational qualifications and an examination, applied in a non-arbitrary manner. These principles undoubtedly also govern the state regulation of legal practice. In Shware v. Board of Bar Examiners,12 the Supreme Court held that a state's bar application standards must not violate the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Constitution."
QUESTION : EVIDENT BREACHES ARISING FROM PUBLIC STATEMENTS : WHEN ARE PUBLIC STATEMENTS APPEARING TO BE FACTS OF LAW ISSUED BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA REQUIRED TO BE COMPLIANT WITH STATE REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ARISING FROM PREREQUISITES ESTABLISHED REGARDING LEGAL ADVICE ?